User:Axolotl61/Mental disorders and gender/Ariannalicupgarcia Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jk2040, Alannacronk, Mk1925, Axolotl61


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Axolotl61/Mental disorders and gender


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Axolotl61/Mental disorders and gender

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * Headers are very concise and clearly articulate the content listed below it
 * Content is very coherent and phrases complex concepts and terms in understandable language
 * Content is organized and structured really well—I appreciate the distinctions emphasized between anxiety, depression, and postpartum depression
 * I'm confused as to why there are so many parts of the article that are slashes out or have a strikethrough? Is this intentional or is it to indicate what your group will be eliminating from the article?
 * I really appreciate the emphasis on social media pressures and criticism and how this plays a large role on gender disparities in experiencing mental disorders—this is extremely relevant and up-to-date