User:Ayabarr23/sandbox


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * This article is related to the topic as it breaks down the full meaning of public criminology. I do believe the transition from sentence to sentence can be more flowing i had to reread a line or two a few times.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Contemporary examples could be updated and I do believe that
 * What else could be improved?
 * The page needs to be cleaned up more grammar, spell check flowing of paragraphs.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * I believe this article is neutral its very broad
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Underrepresented, "In addition, many scholars have struggled with the best ways to reach the public in a meaningful way." the sources behind this feel don't a line with the meaning
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The citation that I have seen have worked, It supports the point but I do think there is some pointless
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * I think that they are neutral but you tell by the depth of these references you can the editor behind it has some bias on the topic.
 * Talk Page
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is a editors expressing there opinion about the content of the article. It is relatable but they feel its more overview and peer review
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Class start low importance, Wikiproject Crime, Law Enforcement, and Sociology
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * I believe its more in depth in regards to the topic with it being the beginning of class were still learning about the subject and becoming more familiar
 * Class start low importance, Wikiproject Crime, Law Enforcement, and Sociology
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * I believe its more in depth in regards to the topic with it being the beginning of class were still learning about the subject and becoming more familiar