User:Ayaide/Nintendo thumb/JRamos24 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Group 15 Nintendo Thumb


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ayaide/Nintendo_thumb?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nintendo thumb

Evaluate the drafted changes
Q1: Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?

The article is well written, concise but full of information as well. It is easy to read and has a clear organization that breaks down the material well. The pictures are used well to provide examples of the injuries, and does act to enhance the article. The organization of this article is a great strong point that makes the article better. Also the links to relevant articles helps to give more context.

Q2: Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?

The group has successfully expanded on the information presented in the article. They've given significantly more background as well as expanded on cases and similar injuries.

Q3: Are the claims included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available?

The secondary sources provided are freely available and information is verifiable from these sources. There's good use of medical journals to further explain and back claims about injuries, as well as good use of new articles to back claims of cases.