User:AyanoTanaka/Hakata Dontaku/Kensu.bates Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (AyanoTanaka)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:AyanoTanaka/Hakata Dontaku

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead should be a couple of sentences to a paragraph long.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
Your content added to your article is relevant to your topic and it is up-to-date. I think that all of your main content is good and belongs to your article. There are some grammatical errors and there are also some places that need a space between words.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
I think that your content is neutral. It doesn't seem like you're over-representing a viewpoint.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Your links work and are current. It seems like most of your content is backed up by reliable sources.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The content that you added is concise and clear but as I mentioned earlier there are some grammatical errors and some spacing issues. I like how you've broken down your content into the specific sections.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
I like the image that you have. It seems like your image adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. Just remember that the safest place to get photos is from wikicommons.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The strength of the content that your added is that it's concise and to the point. Maybe some improvement points is that you can maybe add more on the second day of the festival, May 3rd, and also providing more on what the structure is for the parade and who joins as in famous characters or people.