User:Aydenc2004/Sargassum polyphyllum/ReZappert124 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Aydenc2004


 * Link to draft you're reviewing: :
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aydenc2004/Sargassum_polyphyllum?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article:
 * Sargassum polyphyllum

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) * I think that the information that you currently have is good, and helps to inform the reader about Sargassum polyphyllum
 * 4) * Ayden Response: Thank you.
 * 5) Check the main points of the article:
 * 6) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 7) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 8) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 9) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 10) * The article stays on topic, currently their are no different sections, I think that the information given is appropriate, the writing style and language is appropriate.
 * 11) * I will work on creating different sections.
 * 12) Check the sources:
 * 13) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 14) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 15) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 16) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 17) * Currently there are no references in the article, no reference list, and no sources
 * 18) * I have my sources, I just need to add them to the article itself.
 * 19) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 20) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 21) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 22) * I think some things that can help you to improve your article is add your references, also adding more sections to the article would make the article better.
 * 23) * I plan to do both.
 * 24) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? The most important thing that can be done to improve the article is to add all of the sources that you used to write the article.
 * 25) I have the sources, I just need to add them to the sandbox draft.
 * 26) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? What I noticed in this article that can be used to help me in writing my article is that I need to spread out the information better.
 * 27) I’m glad my work can help improve yours.