User:Ayrielmarie/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Jenni Rivera

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I was interested in the topic and I had seen a television show with the artist and wanted to do more research on her work. This article matters because Jenni Rivera impacted a generation with her lyrics. She empowered women to preserve through difficult times. My initial impression was great regarding the article. I thought it had a lot of detailed information about the artist's personal life. However, upon further inspection I noticed that her legacy and personal impact section needed additional sources. Her life and career section is also heavily detailed.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is clear and concise. It is very detailed and has a variety of sources to support the claims about Rivera's adolescence. The introductory sentence is perfect because it starts from her origins in Mexico. The content is extremely up-to-date and is rather balanced. However, it doesn't have the outcome of her children upon her death, especially her daughter Chiquis who is already mentioned in the article. The article is balanced and neutral. I do not notice any biased points of view. I love the organization of the article. However, I do think the charity section should be in the legacy section. Also, I do not know why her religion is started within the charity section. Perhaps that should be moved to her personal life section. All of the links work and the sources seem appear rather diverse. However, is Facebook considered a reliable source? I believe they should've included more images of Jenni Rivera, specifically while performing. The images used do follow copyright, but at times they are awkwardly placed. Also, I do not think the photo of her ex-spouse was necessary. I do like the detail in the images captions. Overall, the article is well-written and includes important details. The beginning sections are well-developed, however, the last sections appear empty. They do not have as much information and can be vague.