User:Ayub Shahada/Port of Gaza/Alanis C. Santos Alvira Peer Review

General info

 * I'm reviewing the work of Ayub Shahada.
 * User:Ayub Shahada/Port of Gaza

Lead evaluation

 * The contributions added to this lead were significant and helpful in understanding the topic. The lead has a clear idea, which helps the reader understand the topic that will be discussed in the article. I can't find any error in the article's lead.

Content evaluation

 * The added content is relevant to the topic. It is exposed clearly and explicitly. Also, it is free of grammatical errors. Finally, the contributions to this article cover the gaps of Wikipedia, since it exposes the problems of a small community.

Tone and Balance evaluation

 * This article exposes the information and problems of the Port of Gaza neutrally.

Sources and References evaluation

 * The references used to contribute to this article are for the most part reliable and up to date.

Organization evaluation

 * The content of this article is free of grammatical errors and is written in such a way that the reader will be able to understand the subject. It is also clearly divided, which makes reading it easy to go from one topic to another, without losing any information.

Images and Media evaluation

 * At the moment, my peer has not added any images.

Overall impressions

 * Overall, the contributions of my peer have been successful and consistent, they have completed aspects of which the article was lacking. I think it is an important article since it exposes the problems of a community that has been subdued and is literally prey to their own country. In closing, I don't have any negative reviews for these contributions.