User:Az.cr66/McKinsey & Company/Kgl49! Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

az.cc66


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Wiki deleted his so he sent me what he has of his article in a email
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead
The lead covers the entire article because it is very general. Its one sentence and gives the audience and understanding of what will be follows in the article but not enough to have enough knowledge of the situation to be smart about the topic.

Content
The content adds to the company's overlook and it was up to date on the topic. From my understanding, all the information of the story is there in a generalized senses but there could be more details given.

Tone and Balance
Overall, the article is neutral and unbiased. The article only has basic overview information making the article and the content wasn't trying to persuade anyone a certain way.

Sources and References
the sources seem a current as they can be and they seem to be reliable. However there aren't that many of them. The sources are the same information that is listed in the article. The links that are given work.

Organization
The content is well-written with on grammatical errors. For some reason, the article doesn't flow every easily. Also the sections are broken down well.

Images and Media
There are no images or media on the page.

Overall Impressions
Overall, the article is good so far. There does need to be more of an explanation or information about the different scandals so the average reader can understand what is happening. The outline that is already written is well done.