User:Aziz.hadia/Oligohydramnios/Hollireynolds7 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Aziz.hadia/Oligohydramnios


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Oligohydramnios

Peer Review
Lead:


 * I think the lead of this article is beautiful
 * Great flow and hit all the main points

Content:


 * Content is also impressive but I do feel you could add more links to some of the more difficult terms. To a person in the medical field, it perfectly understandable, but it may be more difficult for the average user to follow. I believe links to terms will help with this.

Tone and balance:


 * Tone is appropriate and unbiased

Sources and references:


 * I noticed there are a couple of sources from UpToDate. I wanted to use this source as well but was worried that not everyone would have access to it. Also, when I tried to add a source from UpToDate it would not let me. This may be something we should talk with Dr. Ewing about. UpToDate as the most reliable data on epidemiology for my paper so I am definitely an advocate for using it.

Organization:


 * I thought the article had good flow and was easy to follow. I really liked your use of subheadings under the headings to split up the information. Definitely made it easy on the eyes.

Images and media:


 * I know this is an unfinished product so I'm not sure if you were planning to add images, but I do think it would be great if you did! I know it's difficult to add images to Wikipedia but hopefully you can find at least one to show visually representation of Oligohydramnios or at least what amniotic fluid looks like on ultrasound.

Overall impressions:


 * You clearly put a lot of effort into this article and I think, even unfinished, it is very well done! Great job!

-- Hollireynolds7 (talk) 17:10, 9 November 2021 (UTC)