User:Azucena0709/sandbox

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes everything was relevant to the topic.Nothing was distracting in the page either. It did have 114 sources most were credible except 3 of them did not open.They did have news articles of CNN. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? It seemed neutral throughout the paper. No they were just informing about the topic. They were saying who qualified for it and what you had to do to qualify for it and how. It also talked about the new changes that came this September. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? They made a section called reactions where they focused on what the republicans had to say about the subject. They did not talk about the thought and comments of the democrats. They also added a section that said impact where they talk about the economy health and crime and it says a lot about the topics. In the crime sections it says that they found some information that says illegal people are less likely to commit a crime. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The ones i checked were good. And they did support what they were trying to say in the article. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? When they used the CNN article it was to quote the president Barrack Obama about what he had to say on stoping the Dream Act. So there was no bias. Just using what the president said. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? No they have even added the new changes that have been made in September. They have added that our new president has terminated this. Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? I did not see any. How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It just gives information the topic. Also the changes that have been made to it. Its a very informative paper in my opinion. How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? That you could not add your opinion. You can not be adding straight quotes. That you can not be bias at all. You need to inform people about a topic rather than try to persuade them to do something that you want. There is no specific structure of intro body and conclusion yet you do need to keep in mind the word choice and tone of your article. Since anyone can read this article you need to be able to say it in a way everyone can understand and follow what you want them to get from the article.