User:B.d.mills/Archive

=Archive= This is an archive of outdated stuff from my talk page. -- B.D.Mills  (T, C) 01:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Melbourne
Hi B.D.; I've noticed that you've taken an interest in the WikiProject Melbourne. If you want, add yourself to the members list, we'd love the extra help. You might have noticed that a lot of the things we plan to cover simply haven't begun yet, like the parks and gardens, Mayors and Lord Mayors, landmarks, etc. If you're interested in Melbourne's suburbs though, check out the suburbs subpage and its talk page

TPK 12:29, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC) (Talk)

Glad to have you on board! TPK 08:54, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

What he said. If there's anything I can help with, just yell. Ambivalenthysteria 09:42, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Thanks guys, good to hear from you.

Regarding closed rail lines, two good sources of information would be rail enthusiast shops (such as the one near Spencer St Station) and the State Library of Victoria. I just added the East Kew line to the list from my personal recollection.

There are also a few closed tram and cable tram lines as well. We need a standard format for articles on these. B.d.mills 00:52, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * You were pretty close there. It's the Kew line, not the East Kew line (East Kew was on the Outer Circle, and closed much earlier). I've fixed that, anyway.


 * The State Library is a very good resource. Another place that's been suggested to me is the Prahan Mechanics Institute, which apparently has a good selection of rail books, including several by the ARHS. I did go to that shop near Spencer St, Railfan, once, but found the people to be profoundly unhelpful and uninterested in anything but the trains themselves. Ambivalenthysteria 05:00, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * As for tram lines, there is a list of discontinued routes at List of Melbourne tram routes, but these are mainly fairly recent. Maybe there needs to be a List of closed Melbourne tram routes? TPK 05:03, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I recently visited the State Library and found a good book on the history of the Outer Circle Railway.
 * Title: "The Outer Circle - A History of the Oakleigh to Fairfield Railway"
 * Authors: David V Beardsell and Bruce H Herbert
 * ISBN: 0 85849 024 2
 * Call No: LT 385.099451 B 38 0 (State Library) - it may be found in the domed reading room
 * Publisher: Australian Railway Historical Society (Victorian Division), 1979

The address for the Australian Railway Historical Society as of 1979 was GPO Box 5177AA, Melbourne Victoria 3001.

From this book, I found additional information on the Alamein line which I will include.

B.d.mills 03:41, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Websites Australian Railway Historical Society (Victorian Division).

Melbourne articles
Hey there, I don't know if you've checked up on the WikiProject Melbourne recently, but a few of us have decided to adopt an article or two. The idea is to pick a lacking article and "be in charge" of it - do the research, writing, maybe even picture-taking. We're trying to build up the number of qualiy articles, instead of thinly-spread stubs. Don't feel you have to do anything :), but if you want, pick an article and add yourself to the list. TPK 20:48, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) Talk

Jeffrey W. Parker
I have added more info to the Jeff Parker article, in case you want to reconsider your VFD based on notability. Thanks, 205.217.105.2 18:21, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

Vienam war
Just mark articles like that one with, no need to go through vfd. Thue | talk 13:39, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will remember that. It's my first time doing vfd's and I will take the time to read up about speedy deletes. --  B.d.mills  (Talk) 13:43, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Willie Morris Bioff
Hi. I've done a fairly beefy expansion of this article. -- BD 24 12 thi m k 19:35, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I was going to do that as well but you beat me to it. You've also put a lot more information than I would have had time to do. Good work. Now I can work on my planned expansion of Dorado. --  B.d.mills  (Talk) 00:43, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

No offense, but weren't you a little too quick on the trigger with Willie Morris Bioff. Substubs usually take longer than 30 minutes to become real articles! ---Isaac R 05:26, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Hey, relax. Perhaps I was a little quick off the mark on that one, but at the time I raised the vfd, the full text of the article was "A mafia extortionist". IMO that's not good enough even for a placeholder; I believe that new articles should either be created with complete sentences or the articles are created at another time when more time is available to word the articles properly. The poor sentence structure pushed me to vfd. If the sentence had a verb and proper subject-verb-object sentence structure, it would have got the benefit of the doubt. The system works though; it got discussed, expanded, people changed the vote from "delete" (poor quality) to "keep" (good quality) and all's cool. I've only been doing vfd's for a few days, and I'm still learning the needed techniques.
 * Another note: I was working at a time when there were a couple of people creating articles that needed speedy deletes and I was trying to squash them. --  B.d.mills  (Talk) 13:42, 14 May 2005 (UTC)