User:B11c24/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Economic history - Wikipedia)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am a marketing major who is interested in business and economics as a whole. This article matters because learning about the history of economics can help us understand and try to predict the future of the economic world.

Evaluate the article
Lead section: The lead section of this article was good for me, it provided the definition in the first sentence, and also does a good job of describing the major sections of the article.

Content: The articles content is relevant to the topic. Some of the tables and graphs could have more updated information. I see no content that does not belong, but I did not see a lot of content that addressed topics related to generally underrepresented groups.

Tone and Balance: The article was very neutral overall, but did not see as many minority represented in this topic.

Sources and References: All the links I checked worked, and the sources seemed up to date for the most part.

Organization and Writing Quality: The article is concise, for beginners in the topic it may be hard to follow at times. The sections in the article make sense and are laid out in a way that makes sense.

Images and Media: The media overall is mediocre to me, I feel like there could be more graphs or tables to show some of the things they are talking about.

Talk Page Discussion: The talk page seems very active and people are trying to make this page better.

Overall Thoughts: I thought the article was overall useful and created well. There are some aspects that could use updating but I was able to read the article and gained useful information.