User:B33thov3n70-27/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
String Quartets, Op. 33 (Haydn)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article as it was assigned to me for my Chamber Literature Course. At first glance I notice that not all sections or movements are created equal. There is little to no information about most of the movements.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section

- The lead section looks to be a concise overview of the quartets.

Content

- The articles content is relative but lacking for most of the quartets movements.

Tone and Balance

- The tone and content look to be at a neutral level with no bias.

Sources and References

- Most of the sources are from books. They could be bias in their own opinions toward the topic.

Organization and Writing Quality

- The article is easy to read, and well organized with concise information provided for the reader.

Images and Media

- There are no images in this article. Only lines of music laid out. The first few measure of each quartet movement is laid out for the reader to see how they start.

Talk Page Discussion

- There are few comments on the talk page. Some of the information may seem relevant. This article is part of Category:WikiProject Classical music compositions task force articles and also Category:WikiProject Classical music articles

Overall Impressions

- The article status is adequate. More information about other movements could be added in to improve the articles use.