User:BCBulldog2023/White-footed mouse/Ecology(Species) Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(BCBulldog2023)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * White-footed mouse
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BCBulldog2023/White-footed_mouse?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead clearly describe the article's topic. It highlights the way whitefooted mouse has adapted to the urban area.

The lead does include information that is not present in the article but it supports the article as the information is expanded.

The broken section illustrates the important points about the topic. However, it might need to consider another section as important describing the manner white footed mouse relates to other species in the urban area.

The content seems to be relevant to the topic because it describes important aspects for the animal and how they survive in urban areas. The neutrality of the content helps the reader to not persuade one idea over the other.

Citation is shown in every section providing enough information supporting the author's argument.

Overall, the content structure seems organised and clear