User:BLC340/Coral poaching/Lily.sophia.kate Peer Review

General info
BLC 340
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:BLC340/Coral poaching
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Coral poaching
 * Coral poaching

Evaluate the drafted changes
The proposed additions to the coral poaching article do a good job of maintaining a neutral tone. However, the drafted contribution in the second "political issues" section does lean on the biased side, since the sentence "The mining of live coral has been emphasized as one of the most harmful extractive practices in the region" contains strong adjectives and does not explicitly state who has this viewpoint.

In terms of content, all of the drafted contributions appear to be relevant, but I am not sure that the contribution to the "methods and reasons" section belongs there, because this sentence seems like it would be better placed in the "background" section. I also think that the contribution under the first "political issues" section could be expanded upon to better represent the impact of coral poaching on the economy of the Kuna people.

The sources seem to be reliable, however, the link to the third source does not work. Many of the sources in the references section is also missing some dates, so this should be updated. Furthermore, not all of the sources are current, such as how the last source is from 1995. It may be beneficial to look for more current sources to back up this article's claims.