User:BLeverich/Korean Wave/Zacharysoto96 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (BLeverich)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Korean Wave

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes edited the leads opening sentence in reference to "Hallyu"
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? includes some not all
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? under detailed

Lead evaluation-
The lead could add some information on more of the sections below it to understand it better. The article has alot of information so it's best to do so.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Content evaluation-
The content is up to date and is relevant to the topic, I think adding more information on the countries such as Iraq, UK, France, Germany could be useful such it is very little detailed.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Tone and balance evaluation
Most of the sections provide informational facts rather than persuasive, I think the impace section be go more in depth. But other than that it appears balanced

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Sources and references evaluation
BLeverich used up to date sources as well as reliable ones. I clicked on them and they are working.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Added content on KCON and sourced the interpreted the lead sentence as well providing citations
 * How can the content added be improved? Go more in depth on countries and the influence of the Korean wave to the respected areas

Overall evaluation-
Overall the article is a good one to add information since it seems to be balanced and neutral, the content added is up to date and the sources are reliable. I would like to see some updates on the countries that are influenced by this and maybe the "impact" section as well.