User:BR246615/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)Top, bottom and versatile
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. Because i need to do it for an LGBTQ+ studies class, also i wanted to see what wikipedia said about preference.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? I don't see how one could not be nuetral when descirbing sex positions, There is no favoristisim among the descriptions
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Nope
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Nope
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Most
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The diagrams were indeed useful
 * Are images well-captioned? yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? more or less

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The conversations going on in the talk page greatly improved the article, the addition of pictures, fixing bias and grammatical errors were all due to the talk page
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? We talk about theory and history not really positions

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Acceptable
 * What are the article's strengths? Covered everything evenly
 * How can the article be improved? Omits the possibility of a heterosexual relationship in which a man and a woman can also engage in top and bottom positions, ie pegging.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Well developed, lots of improvements

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: