User:BRH266/Fuel crisis/Bap377 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bethany


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:BRH266/Energy crisis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Energy crisis

Lead
I think the lead looks good, I just might put the actual description of a fuel crisis first as that's usually how wikipedia articles are formatted, but it still looks good that way.

Content
I feel like all the content is relevant and is important either contextually or at the crisis' core. There's just a few typos in the article.

Tone and Balance
I think you definitely have the neutral aspect down. The only thing I would say to work on is how conversational and journalistic the article sounds. I feel like most Wikipedia are very objective statements as opposed to being written like journalism articles if that makes sense.

Sources and References
I think you source pretty well where it's needed. I don't think there's anything to really fix here. Maybe more citations to strengthen some points if I had to say something, but that's probably overkill for what the assignment is.

Organization
The organization here is really good! I think you go from topic to topic in a easy to read way.

Images and Media
N/A

Overall Impression
Looks good!