User:BSC20/Intimate partner sexual violence/Eisjee Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * I am reviewing the work of user 'BSC20'.
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Intimate partner sexual violence

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, the lead has been updated by the user.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, it does, but there could be more detail in the introductory sentence to further explain the topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, the lead includes key topics that will be discussed later in the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, the lead only includes information that is later explained in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is concise, but could just use a bit more detail to introduce the topic better.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the content that has been added to the article is from recent and relevant sources that help explain this topic better.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, the content added is up-to-date with recent statistics about the topic of the article.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * The content that is missing is for the sub-headlines of 'Types of Coercion', as there is mostly only one sentence for each of the titles. However, this is understandable as this is the beginning draft to the article.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * This article does address a topic that has been historically underrepresented such as sexual violence, as this article helps to bring awareness to it which has only become a more recent action to do, as compared to many decades ago.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * The content that is added is neutral as it only states the facts, descriptions and statistics to do the topic being explained.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * There are no claims that appear more heavily biased towards a particular opinion than others.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There are no viewpoints that are more overrepresented or underrepresented than others.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favour of one position or away from another?
 * No, the content added in this article does not persuade the reader to think in any particular way other than simply to be more educated on the topic being discussed.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * The sources are pretty thorough, and generally do reflect the available literature for the topic of sexual violence.
 * Are the sources current?
 * The majority of the sources and references used in this topic are from the current decade, so would be seen as current to the modern time.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * All the links that the user has provided in the sources work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The content added in this article is clearly written in a way for every reader to easily understand what is being explained.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * There are no grammatical or spelling errors in this article.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * The sections of this article were chosen very well, especially with regard to how broad this topic is.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * The content that has been added to this article has generally improved the quality of this article, as it did not have a lot of detail before.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The strengths of the content added is that it includes very interesting statistics and facts that the readers may not have known of before.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * The only way in which the content can be improved is by adding more detail under the Lead and the headline 'Types of Coercion', but as I mentioned earlier, it is understandable as this article is still being edited at the moment.