User:BSC20/Religious discrimination/Adji M 13 Peer Review

General info

 * The article I'm reviewing is the one about Religious discriminiation assigned to User:BSC20.
 * Here is a link to their sandbox: User:BSC20/sandbox

Lead
Although I doubt that the lead has been updated, it still reflects the content added. However, I find that it is still lacking some infirmation and it would be great it my peer could also work on it. The lead is helpful in a sense that we know clearly what the article is going to be about. It describes clearly and concisely the article's topic. However, we do not really know just by reading the lead which route this article is going to take. More details should be added like a description of the article's major sections for example.

Content
We find that the content added is relevant to the topic. Talking about the Uyghurs in religious discrimination and specifically in 2020 is super important to the important. It is also up-to-date.

We also think that there is content that is missing in the article. This article deals with religious discrimination, however we do not really see in-depth and thorough explanations as to why this religious discrimination happens in the first place. There is also no context. The article includes multiple places where the phenomenon takes place but completely omits Africa. Which is not logic when we talk about religious discrimination because a lot of religious wars happen in many African countries, even now in 2020.

This article addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations in some part of the world so mentionning Africa is a must. There is also not much information found about the Middle East, which is surprising since we are talking about religious discrimination. Even in the Western countries, some very important ones that are very important to this topic have been omitted. This whole section should be updated to incude missing information.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content added looks neutral and most claim has been backed by reliable references. However this sentence," The Chinese government is firmly opposed to all ideologies that deviate from those it supports, which explains its opposition to religion", although I personally agree, appears heavily biased and should be backed by more claims. It looks more like a personal point of view. More reliable references should be added to back it up, or it should just be deleted or rephrased.

Sources and References
Although we think that more references should be added, we also believe that the references added are reliable, thorough and up-to-date. All the links cheched work very well too. Diverse authors have been included and they all appear to be reliable and trustworthy.

Organization
Overall, we think this is a very good start for an interesting topic. We find that the problem with this article is not with the content added, but with the original content. The content added is concice, clear and easy to read. It is also grammatically correct and well-organized.