User:Babymel418/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Ara Pacis)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I chose to evaluate it because in the video we watched it said the Ara Pacis was Augustus' monument to peace which really intrigued me.)

Evaluate the article
(The lead sentence is very good, and the lead section provides a good summary however I think the fact of the new orientation of the monument may not be necessary. The article is very detailed about the actual features of the monument, but lacks historical significance and context which makes sense as it may have been lost through time. The article does not address any equity gaps, which in this context could be about the workers who built the monument. The article is very neutral and fact-based, however the last section talking about people's views on its absurdity is kind of strange. The article features many reliable sources, however the comments on the extravagance of the Ara Pacis are once again unnecessary. The links do work. The article is very well-written with no spelling nor grammatical errors that I can see. The images are good quality, however lack context for where on the monument they are. They also are small and a bit hard to see. The article overall is strong, but needs work on image context and placement of some details as it doesn't flow perfectly. )