User:Bacarellam1/Evaluate an Article

DreamWorks Dragons
DreamWorks Dragons

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this to review this article due to personal interest in films and media. Considering that this is not the original works and is instead the spin-off, I was curious to see if there was a lot of information due to the. Beach of the popularity of the movies, I was intrigues to stumble upon this Wiki page as see more information.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

The lead section of the article is short and succinct. I liked that it goes into static th similarities and connection between this TV show and the movie. The first sentence tells the reader at the most important information and then goes on to get into the details. my only complaint is that the placement os the voice actors and their roles seems misplaced here and should be its own section of discussion.

Content:

The author of the page packs in a lot of information. From topics such as the duration of the show and dates during its production including its season and dates. The box includes content such-as the running tom and production team early on. From reviewing the plot, characters and continuing through as all aspects that are import to discussing a television show.

The separation of the characters all has an equal amount of writing on them and goes on to only talk about the main named characters that are in the plot. The incorporation of the dragons with conjunction to the characters may be helpful to an audience who hasn't seen the films. The Reception of the show was my favorite part of the article as it didn't just focus on the show itself but also looked at the external reception of the work.

Tone & Balance:

The tone of the article is very methodical and detailed. With very little bias, the article is still written with personally but sticks to factual information such as dates.

Source and resources:

With a list of 40 resources and 6 external links, the article sources most of tis work from the official websites for the franchise as well as arrivals written about the TV Series. The majority fo these cites, with exclusion of a few places from location such as Walmart blurbs, are all official sites and resources that would have accurate information.

Organization:

The majority fo the apical is well organized and structured, with dedicated location for certain informational ranges. As seen on the content page, different sections as very separate from the others in that they have a dedicated focus.

Images:

A lack of images leaves the reader to look for other sources. Perhaps images of the characters and setting of the show would be beneficial for keeping the aspects of the show understandable.

Talk page:

The Talk page is full of editors that look at aspects of the article such as the external links, titles and character sections. All of the comments on the articles give fair points and help the multiple authors of the article.