User:BaileyArthur475/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Biblical Studies

The article on biblical studies is brief and concise; however, the general flow of knowledge makes it difficult to fully grasp what biblical studies is. Overall, I would not detract anything, but would add and rearrange information. I would add sections on exactly what people in this field study. This article gives a list of questions and a general background, but does not go further into depth of what this field is looking for. I would also add any notable findings from this field to give a more clear picture of what biblical studies produces. I would readjust the layout of the article to make sure people know fully what biblical studies is before diving into the specifics such as organizations and original languages. This is a very neutral article as it is based in factual evidence. There are no religious leaning claims and the article keeps a broad range of facts from multiple sources to create an unbiased article. There seems to be an equal viewpoint on this topic, but there are no mentioned critics of this field which could add a different layer to the article. However, to me this does not seem necessary to inform readers about biblical studies. The sources are credible. After clicking on a few links and reading through them, I found that this article cited sources well. They were valid sources to support their claims about biblical studies. Most of the sources come from other texts exploring the bible, but one thing to note is that many of the authors are religiously affiliated. The article did mention that most people in this field are affiliated, but not all so it was good that the author prefaced the article with that. Most of the conversations surrounding this article are talking about the language in this article as well as linking this to theology. The article was edited in many ways over the years and underwent some major revisions. There are many comments saying that with the current edits and most updated version is a quality article that is a reliable source about biblical studies. This article is a part of three wikiprojects. This article talks mainly about the field and study rather than the demographics within this field. I would say that this article does not dive into the implications of these studies or these studies in a bigger social field. This is a more fact-based article rather than opinions based on facts.

Topic Finder

This article meets the required topics because reproductive technologies often are utilized differently for women of color creating the system of stratified reproduction. This article only discusses how stratified reproduction affects Latina women and while though that is very important, this article does not address bigger institutional issues that go alongside stratified reproduction. This article could be expanded upon to include a larger scope on the topics addressed related to the system of stratified reproduction such as the environmental discrimination, forced sterilization, and the prison system. There could also be a section on the how increasing reproductive technologies play a roll in furthering the system of stratified reproduction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratified_reproduction

- Dominguez, T. P. (2011). Adverse Birth Outcomes in African American Women: The Social Context of Persistent Reproductive Disadvantage. Social Work In Public Health, 26(1), 3-16. This article meets the requirements because reproductive justice includes reproductive technologies and medical care to all women. This includes women of color, people with uteruses, women in prison, etc. This article is a "S" class article that can be fully expanded upon to reach a plethora of untacked topics having to do with reproductive justice. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproductive_justice

- Gaard, G. (2010). Reproductive Technology, or Reproductive Justice? An Ecofeminist, Environmental Justice Perspective on the Rhetoric of Choice. Ethics & the Environment, 15(2), 103–130. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.calpoly.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=55817787&site=ehost-live

This article is about Anita Borg, a computer scientist who helped pave the way for women in the feild. Even though she founded the Institute for Women and Technology and the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing, there is very little on her page. This article is "S" class and has a lot to be added. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Borg

-https://anitab.org/about-us/about-anita-borg/

Draft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BaileyArthur475/sandbox/StratifiedReproduction