User:Baileyberhannan/George Moses Horton/Angelknives009 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Baileyberhannan


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Baileyberhannan/George Moses Horton
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * George Moses Horton
 * George Moses Horton

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has been updated and altered significantly. The lead does include an introductory statement that concisely provides a brief summary of the articles main topic. The lead sentence also provides a brief descriptions of the main sections in the article. The lead is concise and refrains from being overly detailed. All the content Bailey has added is accurate and appropriately used within the article. Everything is up-to-date and there is a few missing section in your sandbox, but I understand it's not completely finished yet. The new additions to the article are stated in a neutral tone. Nothing is heavily biased or geared toward a particular position. Everything in the article is given equal attention, nothing is overrepresented or underrepresented. Some contributions are missing a link to a reliable source of reference.No references have been added yet in the sandbox. However, I'm sure they're all reliable sources just be sure to cite whenever you're adding new information that has not already been cited and belongs to a new source. All the added links within the draft article work well. The structure of the draft is fairly organized and nicely written. A new image was added and it greatly enhances the article by adding an image of the main subject of the article, George Horton. The image was retrieved from Wikipedia Commons, is well captioned, and is displayed in a visually pleasing format on the page. Overall, you have added really great background information especially on his life history to the article. His biography has been really fleshed out and the new sections added are also a nice touch. Great job!