User:Baileycoleman/Octopus bocki/AriBelleB Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Baileycoleman


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Octopus bocki


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead:
 * There is a lot of good information in the lead. However, I would recommend possibly putting the location information in a separate content paragraph such as "Habitat". This way, the lead could be a bit more brief and include an introduction of the articles main sections. This is because the lead currently includes information that is not present in the rest of the article. Other than that, the lead is informatory and concise.
 * Content:
 * The content added is relevant to the topic and is broken up very well. From what I have seen, the information is also up to date. From my knowledge, it does not seem like there is any content "missing", just more that needs to be added to reach your source count. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. The content added is also neutral, does not contain bias, and does not seem to persuade the reader in any way. The content also does seem very organized and broken down so far and I did not see any grammatical or spelling issues.
 * Sources:
 * While you will require more sources, all of the sources you have included so far seem very reliable and are form a variety of different authors. Most are current and I checked some links as well to make sure that they worked.
 * Overall: A great start!