User:Baileymlr/Climate ethics/Maxmcq11 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Baileymlr
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Baileymlr/Climate_ethics

Lead evaluation
The Lead includes lots of recent and accurate information that help give an overview of Climate Ethics. The beginning sentence gives a solid basis of the article's topic but throughout the overview they mention brief sections of information that are correct, but aren't brought up later in the article. The Lead is a little overly detailed, though, it would be nice to see it more summed up.

Content evaluation
The majority of the content added was relevant to the topic and up-to-date. There was not too much information missing, but almost too much information added, and some of it may not be as relevant as the rest.

Tone and balance evaluation
The article is mostly unbiased, but some claims are definitely biased. For example, the entire next sentence leans toward over representing climate ethics due to how it was said: "The idea of climate ethics is majorly important due to its impact on every level of life, from the economy and ecosystems, all the way down to the scale of a single persons' life." This could be taken as trying to persuade the reader.

Sources and references evaluation
A majority of the content that was written included pieces of reliable secondary sources of information. The three sources that were chosen from are reliable, relevant, current, and reflect the article's topic. The links work and sources are from varying authors.

Organization evaluation
The information that was added was written very well. The structure, organization, and information in the added section were solid and easy to follow. The content didn't have any grammatical mistakes that I saw.

Images and media evaluation
There are no images in the article at all. There is not an added image in the edited section either. A graph with climate change statistics or even diagram with components of climate ethics would be a good addition for the article.

Overall evaluation
The added information definitely helped improve the overall quality of the article as well as making the article more informative and complete. Strengths of the content added, is there is now a stronger overview that helps the reader get accurate content of the topic before reading the article. The content can be improved by summing up some sentences at parts, as well as taking out some biased information that over-represents one side of the issue.

~