User:Baileypringle8/Water balance/CSharpMajor7 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Baileypringle8


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Baileypringle8/Water balance


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Water balance

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The changes made are very brief. A lot of surface level information is presented without any deeper exploration or definition. Though it's clear and neutral, it doesn't provide enough information to be complete. It feels more like a summary of the existing article instead of an expansion to it. Grammatically, its fine but is only a few sentences so theres not much to work with here. Exploration of the terms listed in the final sentence would really help this article and give it a lot. more meaning.