User:Baileypringle8/Water balance/Plewis77 Peer Review

I thought this was a very solid start and you have set yourself up nicely for a strong introductory paragraph. Some thing's I would consider:

- Add header's, will help keep your piece organized and understandable

- Talk about why this is important (maybe at the end of the intro paragraph, why does this mean anything?

- I wasn't sure about the source quality, I did a little dig into them and one was written by what looked like an unknown author

- The lead is good as it is very concise and to the point, just close it off as an overall section with more strong points

- Content appears to be neutral and without bias from your sources which is great

Aside from these, I would just put some time in to get more info done. Think you had a great start and to just keep it going. Headers will help keep you organized as you make more progress and as your researching different aspects of water balance.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Baileypringle8


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Baileypringle8/Water balance


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * n/a

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)