User:Bailin yang/Talk:Outline of accounting/Bailin yang Peer Review

Relevance to the topic of the article
== The content of the article closely follows the history, development and services of LinkedIn, with no off-topic content found. There are no obvious distracting elements that focus on its development and impact as a professional networking service. ==

The article omits a description of a recent LinkedIn product or service update, the
== The tone of the article is relatively neutral, providing mostly facts and figures about LinkedIn's evolution. However, there is less description of the discussion of how LinkedIn has impacted workplace culture, the hiring process, or career development. ==

== There is less discussion of how LinkedIn handles data privacy and user security, and given that this is an important topic for the social media platform, adding this aspect could increase the value and relevance of the article. ==

Evaluating the sources
== The article lists a number of cited sources, but without direct links, it is difficult to assess the validity and reliability of these sources. Ensuring that each fact is reliably referenced and that these sources are from a variety of authors and publications is essential to maintaining the neutrality and depth of the article. ==

Discussion pages
== No mention is made of the content of Wikipedia's discussion pages. Discussion pages can reveal community feedback and suggestions about the content, structure, or presentation of an article, and help to understand what kind of disagreement or consensus exists among community members about how to present the topic. ==

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)~
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)