User:Baldvegan123/Poltergeist/Allig11 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Baldvegan123


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Baldvegan123/Poltergeist&veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template&redirect=no


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Poltergeist

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The new introduction paragraph accurately describes the articles topic. It is brief, concise, and reflects some of the information that will be talked about later.
 * The new content that is added is relevant, up to date, and goes well with the content that is already in the article. The information you added is clear and flows well. I think maybe you could add another section going into more detail about the Conjuring House since it's one of the places that many people today have heard of.
 * Neutral tone was used the whole time, never tried to persuade the readers. Everything was presented equally; nothing was underrepresented or overrepresented.
 * I would suggest adding citations to the content you added to back up this information and show that it is reliable.
 * Everything is well-written; I did not notice any spelling or grammatical errors.
 * I can see where you are adding new information to existing sections, but I am not sure where the Ed and Lorraine Warren section is going.
 * Strengths= The content that is added is relevant, clear concise. I think adding the Ed and Lorraine Warren section is important and key because many people have heard of them and some of the famous cases that are listed in the article involve them. I like how you are adding more information about the famous cases, as it gives the readers more insight.
 * My only suggestions would be to add citations and to show where you will be adding the Ed and Lorraine Warren section just to give a better idea of the structure of the article and show that it flows well.