User:Balloonman/AfD/GDI technology of Command & Conquer

GDI technology of Command & Conquer
I tagged this for merging on 25 October, in case someone was interested, but this entire article is filled with in-universe or game guide information and there isn't really much worth saving. Delete or transwiki, if someone is willing.  Pagra shtak  19:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions.  Pagra shtak  22:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, per reasoning with other nominations. Marasmusine 18:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per my reasoning in the other nominations. Jtrainor 08:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge - these articles have been tagged for awhile, so it seems to me that improvement may not be forthcoming. Nevertheless, given the preponderance of reliance on this (and the relevant Nod article) by the parent articles, and other franchise articles in general, thought should be given to hanging onto them for a while longer, or at least merging the contents in with the main GDI or Nod articles. MalikCarr 08:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * There's nothing worth merging.  Pagra shtak  15:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per my reasoning in the other nominations.--Eldarone 19:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per Eldarone's reasoning. Peptuck 19:41, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per my reasoning at the other one (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied technology of Command & Conquer). Mi re  ma  re  19:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, for stated reasons. Heh, Wikipedia gets more useless and useless for lore everyday. Mikael GRizzly 07:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep it. It is a long featured article and it has been used for a long time. Also Mikael in the CNC Wiki please make more strategies and Tactics for both RA2 and Generals not just the Tiberium Series.(TougHHead 08:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC))