User:Balloonman/CSD Survey/1.10

Original Article
your mom had sex wiht a dick face

Nomination Criteria
G10 Pages that serve no purpose but to disparage or threaten their subject or some other entity (e.g., "John Q. Doe is an imbecile"). These are sometimes called "attack pages". This includes legal threats, and may also include a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral version in the page history to revert to. Administrators deleting such pages should not quote the content of the page in the deletion summary, and if the page is an article about a living person it should not be restored or recreated by any editor until it meets biographical article standards.

Survey Comments

 * or could delete as BLP that has no assertion of notability
 * G3, just vandalism. Not directed at anyone specific, but I certainly would not complain to someone deleting it as G10. Heck, I may just do it as that by reflex, in my attempt to nuke it as fast as I could.
 * agree with rationale, assuming there is no better version in page history
 * If this was a user page created by someone other than the user then G10 is correct as "your mom" is identifiable. otherwise its just vandalism
 * Clearly a "G3". Also, I would agree with the G10 rationale as well if the title of the article was the name of a person.
 * I thought G10 was for attack pages with specific targets; this is just G3 vandalism
 * This assumes that the title of the article refers to the person's name. If the title was random, CSD G3 (blatant vandalism) would be better.
 * G10 if subject identifiable, G3 otherwise
 * G3/vandalism, A1, and if "your mom" was replaced with "subject of article's mom" then G10.
 * I would delete this under G3. The insult isn't specifically directed at any one subject or entity - it's just vandalism.
 * It's fine as a G10 though much better as a G3. We donlt need to be too caught up in the niceties of that this is not really an attack against anyone in particular. Certanly vandalism though

Balloonman's analysis
G3 is the better choice because the article is vandalism, it isn't an attack page? Who is it attacking? There are not names mentioned.