User:Balloonman/CSD Survey/2.2

Original Article
Billy Guest and Kurt Halpin own a freezing compony and freeze things. how we do it... we will never tell its a secret. PROJECTS

project x (top secret)

project xx (top secret)

project xxx (top secret)

project xxxx (top secret)

project winklehuffer (top secret)

project awa ( not so secret)

project murphy the rock (we try to keep it a secret but its a bit hard when he live in a freezer and mums always taking him out and replacing him with iceblocks:( ENIMIES Thurtells Amos (the fat one) Bostock (the marshmellow)

Nomination Criteria
G1 Patent nonsense. Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This does not include poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, poorly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes; some of these, however, may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases.

PATENT NONSENSE is defined as: 1) Total nonsense, i.e., text or random characters that have no assignable meaning at all. This includes sequences such as "sdfgdsfkgdshgdkhgdsklhsklgroflmaolololol;;;'dsfgdfg", in which keys of the keyboard have been pressed with no regard for what is typed. 2) Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever.

Survey Comments

 * Speedy delete. All other options are bureaucratic fiddle-faddle.
 * "completely and irredeemably confused" applies in my humble opinion
 * Obvious delete, even if speedies don't quite cover it.
 * A7. Possibly G2. No harm in going to PROD/AFD.
 * I'd delete this under A7, as a group (Billy and Kurt's "freezing compony") with no assertion of notability.

Balloonman's analysis
The argument for G1 does exist on this article, but it is weak. The article is not so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever. You can make some sense of it, but it is very poorly written, which is explicitly excluded from G1.

The article is, however, a very prime contender for A7. It is a company that makes not claim of significance or importance.