User:Balloonman/CSD Survey/3.3

Original Article
a evil southamerican rat from hell, thought to be saitanist. often sacrificed 2 da ghods for getting better crops from vegas. if u feed them cocane they will evolve into a pickachu/slash/hillary clinton doll and reak havok on our biology teachers lawn.due 2 the butterfly effect if u vaporive 1 and eat it pluto will self destruct and alot of dalmations will fly out. and head for earth n' head for the pentagons brother the octogon 2 blow up.

Nomination Criteria
G1

Patent nonsense. Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This does not include poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, poorly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes; some of these, however, may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases.

PATENT NONSENSE is defined as:

Total nonsense, i.e., text or random characters that have no assignable meaning at all. This includes sequences such as "sdfgdsfkgdshgdkhgdsklhsklgroflmaolololol;;;'dsfgdfg", in which keys of the keyboard have been pressed with no regard for what is typed. Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever.

Survey Comments

 * it is "completely and irredeemably confused".
 * Speedy Delete as A24 - fancruft. (not really, PROD or AfD)
 * Some hint of sentence structure doesn't mean it's not total nonsense.
 * Has meaningful content. Delete as vandalism.

Balloonman's analysis
G1 or G3 are perfectly acceptable. I personally prefer G1. This is a perfect example of WP:NONSENSE bullet 2: ''Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever. ''

Is it also vandalism? Yes, so I have no problem with that either.