User:Balloonman/CSD Survey/4.5

Original Article
Maher Diab, also known as GOD for many civilizations, including the entire Middle-East region, Europe and North Korea, is also represented by the symbol ♥ Image:MaherDiab.jpg#file|Caption1

Nomination Criteria
A7

An article about a real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. A7 applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on. A7 does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion.

Survey Comments

 * Incredible self-assertion of notability. That jpg seems to depict a real person. Might nn-userfy
 * Delete as vandalism/blatant misinformation
 * Prod as probably hoax. BTW, CSD does not explicitly exclude hoaxes and implausible theories if it is blatant.
 * Certainly isn't an A7. A google search would probably tell me if it was a G3 or an AfD candidate.
 * No answer. Where in this is an indication that it's about a fictional person?
 * Maher Diab may be a real person but the article content is fictional
 * Maher Diab is certainly the name of a real live person, no indication that this claim to godhood is true
 * Nonsense, vandalism,or test page.
 * A7 fails, but I'd check for hoax or possibly an existing article about the subject to bold-merge or bold-redirect. I'd probably PROD.
 * Either A7 or G3 would work. I'd like to know what the creator's username is before I made my decision.
 * Possibly G3 as a hoax but only after a check; Google is conclusive for a claim of this magnitude, i.e, no Google hits
 * utterly implausible claim to importance

Balloonman's analysis
A7 does not work as A7 is explicitly about a real person. As this is a claim about "God," it is not a real person.

G3, however, works perfectly as this is clearly vandalism.