User:Balloonman/CSD Survey/4.8

Original Article
== shadowrun vehicles ==

In shadowrun there are many vehicles. Such as cars, trucks, airplanes, and boats. If your running low and ammo for your Shadowrun weapons you may need a speedy get away. Whether your going to drive away in your car or speed of into the sun set on your jet ski, having a vehicle in this game usualy just makes thing eisier, if you can drive them... Some shadowrun vehicles are for show while other are for actoin. Most trucks are slow but can take more damage where as say a subcompact spirit-honda are fast but weak. Before buying a vehicle you should take in-acount that diffrent vehicles are good for diffrent jobs. So if you planning on robbing a bank your going to want a vehicle that is balanced between speed (for the get away) and strenght (so when the cops come they don't destroy your car) There are alot of upgrades for Vehicles to. Exaples: A new paint job. Run-flat tires. (tires that can drive even if they go flat) mirroir windows. (makes it so bullets can go out but not in) or bullet proof plating. some charactars have the ability to use there mind to control whatever vehicle there driving but it takes time to come out of this state. These charactars are called shadowrun wriggers.



COMMENT: Shadowrun is a RPG that was popular in the 80's/early 90's.

Nomination Criteria
A1

No context. Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." Context is different from content, treated in A3, below.

Survey Comments

 * There is context (in the form of a wikilink to the Shadowrun article), but this information is redundant to that in the article Shadowrun. It should therefore be deleted, but does not satisfy any speedy criteria. I would use PROD.
 * It's an odd little essay that would probably die at AfD, but it's nowhere near any CSD.
 * Speedy-merge and redirect to Shadowrun, if that article exists and content can be referenced. Otherwise, PROD.

Balloonman's analysis
A1's key phrase has two parts:

1) Very short articles: A very short article is generally 2 sentences or fewer.  This has many more sentences, thus is not eligible for A1.

2) lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article: There is enough context to identify the subject of the article, thus A1 is not appropriate.

Thus, this was clearly deleted per the wrong criteria.

This even has too much information for A3 to be applied. Is it vandalism? No, therefore G3 does not apply. Is it patent nonsense? No, therefore G1 does not apply.

This article should be PRODed or Merged into the main article. Or, if there is sufficient material for it's own article it needs to be expanded and cleaned up.