User:Balwaadh/Marie-Odile Marceau/Theodore.yu Peer Review

General info

 * Theodore.yu
 * Christina Perks

Lead

 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, the information is concise and factual.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The lead describes Christina Perk's background, residence and the architecture she is known for.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes there is a contents page and information box section.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * The lead details concise information about her background and the article details each chapter in her career.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The last two sentences of the lead could be included in the body of the article instead.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Some quotes from Christina were added, supporting some of the facts in the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Possibly updating the work she has done in the 21st century, or her contribution to the profession?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * The content covers early life up until retiring from the public sector.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * The lead section could be more concise instead of adding a quote.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Christina's views of women in architecture are included, this can be left out since it is a factual based article about her life and career.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * Direct quotes from Christina included in the article.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * Christina's quotes may present a biased perspective about the progression of her career.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, the sources are from credible architectural membership associations and published journals.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * The quotes included in the article are from OAA perspectives.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes they are current and reliable.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The content can be more concise and reduce personal quotes from Christina.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * The lead has some grammar and sentence structure errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * The body of the work under the heading career is hard to follow. It would be better to break this section down into early career, notable projects, and retirement or private practice.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * The image added is a portrait of Christina, it helps the reader understand the subject described.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes, there is an info-box with concise information underneath the image.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes, the image is from Wikimedia Commons.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes the image is beside the lead section.