User:Banner18/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

LGBT rights in Spain

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it touches on a variety of topics relevant to the Queer Spain class I'm taking, so I may have something to contribute to it. It matters because it functions as a summary of the freedoms afforded to a marginalized group and the history behind them. I was impressed by how thorough it is in covering a variety of subtopics related to the overall topic at hand.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Overall, the article is very well-done. The lead section is sets expectations for the remainder of the article and is relatively concise, though longer because of this article's rather expansive topic. The content of the article is, as far as I can tell, relevant and up-to-date. The tone of the article is neutral and informative, while the article also is careful to use language that is respectful of the LGBT community. The sources are pretty relevant and current, and the links are functional. The article is well-written and organized in a logical manner. The images are captioned accurately and all apply to the topic of discussion. The talk page for the article is somewhat sparse, but the article is part of multiple WikiProjects (Spain, LGBT Studies, Human Rights, and Politics).