User:BaoNgo97/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Art criticism

Talk:Art criticism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
As far as I know, descriptive and critical analyzes of works of art have long become an indispensable part of the art world. Art criticism can have its own roots in art itself. It can be broadly defined as a discussion and explanation of art and its value, in order to pursue a sound rationale for judging art. Definition of art criticism is a form of literature that condenses or amplifies, emphasizes or arranges, or attempts to bring harmony to all the ideas that come to mind when it encounters an artistic phenomenon, with a domain that extends from metaphysics to inactive. Interpretive analysis and aesthetic judgment have dominated discourse and art criticism for a long time, and art criticism has become an essential part of contemporary artistic dynamics. Criticism plays an important role in developing and deepening an artist's work but also helps viewers perceive and interpret the work of art.

Evaluate the article
Lead SectionMany cultures have a strong tradition of art appreciation. Appreciating a work of art for its beauty, order and form or for its utilitarian qualities and its role in general and spiritual activities. In this article, the most important is writing about the Western critics.

A fundamental aspect of an aesthetic point of view is experience. The actual meeting between this viewer/critic and the work in front of him/her is the basis of the critical process. This distinguishes criticism from many other prominent approaches to works of art. History or other forms of contextual studies want to shed light on work by bringing it back to its original context. The personal aesthetic experience of the work - for the time being - is underestimated and sometimes denied. Theoretical study wishes to clarify the work by placing it in generalized systems and structures, abstracting it, often again, separating it from the personal aesthetic experience. Empirical criticism, on the other hand: conceives of the work as an exposition or experience of work, and is based on attractiveness to experience; it satisfies the aesthetic experience when the job encounters; Note that work experience can be modified by knowledge of many contexts, new evidence, other works, life experiences and by taking into account the experiences of friends and colleagues. industry and students; and finally, it is intended to contribute to the reader's experience of the work.

Content

This article writing about how Art criticism grew exponentially in the 19th century, when artists began working on works with an uncertain future. Instead of working for church or government, whose commissions demand ideological and often stylistic relevance, the artists have become freelance and seemingly free producers for an the market is not always available. Salon standards were bound by tradition until the mid-19th century, when they began to relax under the pressure of new art theories, developed in response to new art forms, capital rebels against traditional models.

Part of art criticism, formally and broadly, contributes to an ongoing conversation about the work. This is one reason why criticism tries to function in plain language - in addition to using creative terminology and artistic language - and against being overly defined by speeches. Specialized documents from other majors. Such statements may also be necessary in order to take up alternative positions, for example, when making a radical criticism. For critics, however, these will disrupt its continuity with the creative processes of the art in which it engages and intelligently communicates every day about aesthetic experiences.

Tone and Balance

The article is from a neutral point of view and without any claim that seems to be biased towards a particular position. The article does not show any opinion that is overrepresented or misrepresented because it has given many concrete examples and evidence-based on minority or marginal views that are accurately described. The article is not trying to persuade readers to appreciate the work of art in a particular way but to evaluate it in an objective way. For critics, however, these will disrupt its continuity with the creative processes of the art it engages in and intelligently communicate everyday aesthetic experiences. Art criticism is the detailed analysis and evaluation of a work of art. While no two people will experience the same response to a piece of art or interpret it the same way, there are some basic guidelines you can follow to achieve a thorough review thoughtfully and thoughtful. The basic elements of art criticism are description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment.

Sources and References

All facts in the article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information and the sources are reflect the available literature on the topic. The sources are currently present and the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors include historically marginalized individuals where possible.

In translation issues, some of the source criticism principles are common, others are specific to certain types of information sources. Logical positivism holds that all domains of knowledge are based on the same principles. Most criticisms of logical positivism claim that positivism is the basis of science, while hermeneutics is the basis of human science. Hermeneutics is therefore a universal theory. The difference, however, is that the sources of human sciences are themselves the product of human interest and knowledge, while the natural sciences are not.

Organization and writing quality

Yes, the article is well written and concise, clear and easy to read. The article also divides sections to assign time and space to help readers easily search for available comparison items. The article has no grammatical and spelling mistakes. The text is clear and professional, and the content should be streamlined into sections.

The article is well organized and divided into sections that reflect the main points of the topic, but more history art appreciation was needed before the 18s. The article should include more works than work reviewers.

Images and Media

The article contains images that enhance the topic's understanding but are actually too few to convey the purpose of the article. All images are well annotated and they comply with Wikipedia's copyright regulations. All images are organized in a visually appealing way, but I think there should be more descriptive models of the artwork than reviewers or artists.

Talk page discussion

There is no doubt that bloggers have influenced art criticism. The conversation type is just adding or modifying to posts. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philosophy-related content on Wikipedia. This article was rated Start-Class on the project's quality scale. This article has yet to receive an assessment on the importance of the project. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any given moment can be destructive, a job in progress or just wrong. Wikipedia often uses trustworthy secondary sources, veterinarian data from primary sources, and how Wikipedia discusses this topic is different from the way we talked about it in class.

Overall impressions

I think a rule of thumb to go by is if the writer or art blog has a Wikipedia article that has shown reliable sources it is probably worth mentioning in this section. I agree that the article can be improved, but I think the two articles need to remain independent and they require different kinds of content. Art criticism is historically considered the criticism/debate about visual art. Art criticism is an article that needs to be the focus on the historiography of art criticism, which changed significantly through time and it has specific references. I believe the two concepts can be merged and I think the article is not strong to deliver its concept to readers.