User:Bap027/Pygmy hog/Ilk12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bap027


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bap027/Pygmy_hog?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pygmy hog

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The Lead appears to have been updated to reflect the new content added by my peer (about pygmy hog characteristics, behavior, and ecology). The Lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article’s topic, as of the current information provided. The Lead could reference a few more of the article’s major sections, but it isn’t crucial to do so - it is successfully concise.

Content:

The content added is very relevant and up-to-date to the topic. Thus far, the content appropriately reflects the topic. My peer is intending on adding more content to provide a comprehensive overview of the pygmy hog. There is currently no unnecessary content and plenty of opportunity to include additional information in their article because of its undeveloped status.

Tone and Balance:

The content added to the article is neutral - there is no bias, overrepresentation, underrepresentation, or persuasion in the information.

Sources and References:

The new content that my peer added is backed up by reliable secondary sources of information. After referring to the sources referenced, the content appears to accurately reflect these thorough sources. Furthermore, the sources added are both current - each from within the past five years. The sources added are some of the most relevant out of the ones included in the original article (many of which are outdated).

Organization:

The content is currently well written - it is clear and void of spelling and grammatical errors. Additionally, the article itself is structured concisely which makes it easier to read.

Images and Media:

The article includes one photograph and two diagrams that enhance the understanding of the topic - all of which are well-captioned and laid out in a visually appealing way.

Overall Impressions:

Overall, the content added has improved the quality of the article. It appears that my peer is on the right track for enhancing their article about pygmy hogs and continued development will yield a successful piece.