User:Barkeep49/SNG RfC draft

This RfC is a proposal to modify the language of a section within the WP:Notability guideline that deals with subject-specific notability guidelines (SNGs). Recently, it has been noted that the current language on WP:SNG is not crystal clear, and is ripe for misinterpretation. The specific concept that is unclear is the exact role that SNGs play in determining the notability of a topic.


 * Recent consensus discussions

Recent discussion on the topic have taken place at WT:N, another lengthy discussion on WT:N in May 2020, and an RfC on a closely related topic took place on the Village Pump in 2017.

Below are four options for the section. Which of the four options most closely meets what you think it should say? Further fine tuning/wordsmithing would be possible through normal discussion following the RfC
 * Options
 * Option 1 - current since May 2020
 * Option 2 - proposed revision
 * Option 3 - alternative proposed revision
 * Option 4 - there should be no SNG section (pre-May 2020 status quo)

Poll
''Please state which option(s) you support. If you support more than one option indicate your preference.''

Variant 1
This RfC is a proposal to modify the language of a small section within the WP:Notability guideline that deals with subject-specific notability guidelines (SNGs). Recently, it has been noted that the current language on WP:SNG is not crystal clear, and is ripe for misinterpretation. The specific concept that is unclear is the exact role that SNGs play in determining the notability of a topic.


 * Recent consensus discussions

Recent discussion on the topic have taken place at WT:N, another lengthy discussion on WT:N in May 2020, and an RfC on a closely related topic took place on the Village Pump in 2017.

Below are three options for the section. Which of the three options most closely meets what you think it should say? ''The linked language is intended to be an example for that option. Final wordsmithing and refinement will take place at the end of the RfC (if applicable)'' Diff of sample language between Options 2 & 3
 * Options
 * Option 1 there should be no SNG section (pre-May 2020 status quo)
 * Option 2 there should be an SNG section that does ABC (Example of possible Option 2 language)
 * Option 3 there should be an SNG section that does DEF (Example of possible Option 3 language)

Poll
''Please state which option(s) you support. If you support more than one option indicate your preference.''

Variant 2
This RfC is a proposal to modify the language of a small section within the WP:Notability guideline that deals with subject-specific notability guidelines (SNGs). Recently, it has been noted that the current language on WP:SNG is not crystal clear, and is ripe for misinterpretation. The specific concept that is unclear is the exact role that SNGs play in determining the notability of a topic.


 * Recent consensus discussions

Recent discussion on the topic have taken place at WT:N, another lengthy discussion on WT:N in May 2020, and an RfC on a closely related topic took place on the Village Pump in 2017.

Below are three options for the section. Which of the three options most closely meets what you think it should say? ''The linked language is intended to be an example for that option. Final wordsmithing and refinement will take place at the end of the RfC (if applicable)'' Diff of sample language between Options 2 & 3
 * Options
 * Option 1 there should be no SNG section (pre-May 2020 status quo)
 * Option 2 there should be an SNG section that explains the interaction of SNGs and GNG (Example of possible Option 2 language)
 * Option 3 there should be an SNG section that merely describes what SNGs are and leaves the interaction between an SNG and GNG to specific SNG pages (Example of possible Option 3 language)

Poll
''Please state which option(s) you support. If you support more than one option indicate your preference.''