User:Barliner/Archive1

Welcome to WikiProject North East England
, we're glad your here. If you wish you can start up a discussion at the Project talk page or if you prefer to just editing articles you may, if you have any questions about the project (or Wikipedia in general) then please leave a message on my user talk page and I'll give you a hand, Thanks -  Te ll y a ddi ct  16:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Germany


Welcome,, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template WikiProject Germany. A few features that you might find helpful:
 * The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
 * Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to [ watchlist it].
 * We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! -- Kusma (talk) 21:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar


Awarded before I reregistered (no access to old e-mail). Maybe soon merging accounts will become possible...

Please discuss
You removed the image here but didnt take part in the discussion yourself. Why? --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 14:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC).
 * I don't need to participate in a discussion to carry out the results of that discussion, as shown on the image's talk page.
 * Ok well, keep checking the article, the image will be back soon. I'm talking to the admin who made the (wrong) decision to take it out. And sign your posts. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 15:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Your reply seems to illustrate some form of fanaticism on your part. The "wrong decision" was made by discussion. If you have checked the relevant talk page you will know how to have the decision amended. bär lin er chat 15:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC), on my page
 * your signature doesnt have any links. See how I have linked mine. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 15:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

There seems to have been an assumption of bad faith towards a number of editors. In any case, Matt has (rightly) taken this to fair use review. → AA (talk • contribs) — 18:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Typos
Although I appreciate and can relate to your desire to fix typographical errors, it is considered impolite to correct other editors' errors on talk pages. Baseball Bugs 11:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Apologies. I changed the automated search preferences and included talk pages without noticing. User:Barlinerchat 11:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Rogereeny. Also, your routine missed one, as I recall. :) Baseball Bugs 11:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. If its on that page I'll leave it :) but I have seen it pick up "receeve" but not the word before it "ot receeve". Wonder if it will pick up my talk page now ...   User:Barlinerchat 12:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

helpme Charbonnel et Walker
The article Charbonnel et Walker has I section on liquidation of the company. I see it in the edit page but not the preview or the article itself. I have cleared the cache, and even looked using a different computer. Have probably missed an obvious formatting character over abd over again, but what is it. Please help. I can expand the article once this problem is solved. Thanks  User:Barlinerchat 09:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The last ref entry was missing a "/" at the end. → AA (talk • contribs) — 09:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks I went through that ref line by line. Blinded by my own eloquence :)   User:Barliner[[Image:Flag of Berlin.svg|25px]]chat 10:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Austin Peay
Good catch on my typo. More than a little embarrassing. Thanks! Cornell Rockey 19:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Walter-Scheel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Walter-Scheel.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.

Have removed fair use templates and replaced the licence with what I believe is the correct version. Hope this is OK.
 * 1) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -Nard 15:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Walter-Scheel.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Walter-Scheel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).


 * Have removed fair use templates and replaced the licence with what I believe is the correct version. Not yet added image back to the two pages it linked to

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -Nard 15:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Tagging of Hotel Sharavathi
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Hotel Sharavathi. I do not think that Hotel Sharavathi fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because the db-afd tag should only be used where an WP:AFD or other deletion discussion has been held and consensus has been reached. As far as i can see, that did not happen in this case. Perhaps you will wish to stsrt one. I request that you consider not re-tagging Hotel Sharavathi for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing my error User:Barliner  [[Image:Flag of Berlin.svg|25px]]  chat 09:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Walter-Scheel.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Walter-Scheel.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 13:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * So so sorry but I believe the German law only makes the TEXT of German laws PD, not any pictures. You are encouraged to leave a comment defending your claims. In particular a link to an English translation of the court case you cite (or at least a German one if no English translation is available). -Nard 13:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Henry I of Haiti
helpme

I am citing from the same book several times. Is there any way to give different page refs without cutting and pasting the entire template each time?

I have opted to use (author, page#)refname which looks a little ugly in the article. The only alternative seems to be: first use, second reference.

Am I right?

User:Barliner   chat 12:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * See Citing more than once. Assign the first reference a unique "name", then simply use that name for later refs.  Hoof Hearted 12:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks but that doesn't allow changes of the page quoted. WP:FN seems to prefer the sevond version I quoted. I'll change my citations User:Barliner    chat 13:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Your signature
Hi. I like the little Berlin flag in your sig; it's one of my favourite cities. Unfortunately our rules prohibit the use of image files in a signature. I wonder if you'd mind changing it? Sorry to be a nuisance, best wishes --John 14:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Bot at work?
Hi, I corrected a formatting error on Fudgie Frottage and then got a message that it was "not constructive." Please explain if I'm missing something or if this was just a bot catching potential vandalism. Benjiboi 21:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * must be a botbug somwhere. you are listed as changing pronuciation: (Fudge-ee Froh-TAHZH) to pronuciation: (Fudge-ee Froh-TAHZH) The Man With The Biggest Balls in Show Business

Removing vandalism tags may not be etiquette but as it was my tag and the article is CSD I suggest you do, with my apologies. I will examine the histories and see what happened.  barliner  21:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * not sure what vandalism tag you mean - could you deal with it? Benjiboi 21:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter August 2007
 * --Christopher Tanner, CCC 16:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

BOE note images
Rather than listing at PUI, might I suggest the constructive approach to the problem: correct the copyright tag; and get an updated release from the bank (it's not hard). Make, don't break. Thanks/wangi 21:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status
The Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to and/or  status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Kate McCann
An anon vandalized this legitimate page, and you nominated the result for deletion instead of checking the edit history. Please withdraw your nomination. THF 01:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kate McCann
An article that you have been involved in editing, Kate McCann, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. gidonb 13:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to the League of Copyeditors
I'm very sorry I haven't had a chance to welcome you earlier, I have been incredibly busy lately. We are glad to have your help. Currently, we have really cut down the backlog of articles in need of copyedit. Therefore, a major goal at this moment is to identify new articles that are in need of work. When you run across them, be sure to tag them for copyediting.

If you have any questions at all, do not hesitate to drop me a line. Trusilver 06:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

C. W. Alcock
I'm unclear why your recent "clean up using AWB" has removed the England-cricketbio-stub template from the article. Given Alcock's significance in cricket history, the cricket section is very brief, and it seems to me reasonable to flag the piece as a stub for the purposes of the Cricket WikiProject. JH (talk page) 18:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * This was an automatic change suggestion which I missed. The article as a whole is not a stub, the cricket section is so I have restored  . Thanks for letting me know.  --  Barliner  talk  18:42, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. JH (talk page) 19:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Henry Havelock - career
Good work, but a minor quibble. When two officers of equal rank wished to swap postings, with the consent of their Colonels, this was an exchange. This arrangement was frequently made if an officer wished to remain in Britain, and another wished to go overseas, for adventure or better prospects or whatever. Where an officer was posted from one regiment to another, perhaps to fill a gap left by casualties, this was a transfer. I suspect that the former was the case in most of Havelock's changes of posting. HLGallon 20:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the praise and the info. For the uninformed, like me, transferred is the standard term, but a about the difference would be useful, as would saying (at least once) "he and another officer exchanged postings". I can make more changes latter today, including a better photograph of the statue.  By the way, when was he knighted.  I have added KCB after his name based on the titles of two books in further reading, but a date would be useful, especially as he never got his baronetcy.  --  Barliner  talk  11:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Recent edits
Hey. I've noticed some of your recent edits, which includes changing England to United Kingdom and removing pipelinks on football players articles. Well, England is used instead of UK is simply because the UK has no standing in fooball. And pipelinks are used to show the clubs more commonly used name, so we don't have to see "F.C." all the time. Cheers, Mattythewhite 11:19, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've only edited the people from Sunderland category, no others footballers. I changed England only as a country of birth, not - of course - the national team, I hope.  Cheers.  --  Barliner  talk  12:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007 WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter September 2007

--Christopher Tanner, CCC 15:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Jack Black
I realise that with this revert you probably followed the anon. user from Meg White's article, but you should have reverted further since there was a false statement that Black had died. Not a major problem, but please cast your eye around the revert more before going ahead. - Dudesleeper · Talk 22:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I reverted several missed vandalisms yesterday, for some reason that struck me as maybe authentic, but I never googled it to check. --  Barliner  talk  11:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Missing image Image:12SSHJinsig.png.svg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:12SSHJinsig.png.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:12SSHJinsig.png.svg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:12SSHJinsig.png.svg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 20:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * image corrupted.  Barliner  talk 15:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Why do you delete my addition to the real time stratege?
It is not mass links, nor spam! It is just extra information and highly related to the topic. It is there before but removed by accident. (thought was in ref section but actually it is not!) If you think the links are too much, you can just concate the links to one. Remove it result in less information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.48.136 (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup templates
Just to let you know that most cleanup templates, like "unreferenced", "fact", "cleanup"etc., are best not "subst"ed. See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards,

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NPD-logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:NPD-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This image appears on commons Image:NPD.jpg --  Barliner  talk 12:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
I only want to say "Thank you"! I love the "Template:BD" you have created and I use it as often as possible! Thanks and :) Doma-w 16:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Revert on Iraq insurgency
Can you explain why you reverted my edit on Iraq insurgency. Specifically what you meant by ''Reverted to revision 166024839 by NickCatal; revert because of pov changes even to quotes and book titles. using TW'' Thanks --Nick Catalano contrib talk 16:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I reverted two IP edits back to your version, not your version. One change was obviously semi-automatic, the word insurgency had been changed to resistance even in quotes from Americans, and leaving phrases such as "an resistance"  --  Barliner  talk  18:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Ahh, OK, thanks. Had never seen that edit summary before --Nick Catalano contrib talk 21:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Era logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Era logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter November 2007
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter November 2007

--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 04:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter December 2007
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter Decemberr 2007

--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 22:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The Wessex Children
Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at WikiProject British Royalty. Yours in anticipation, DBD 16:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Incorrect sort keys
Don't be running around changing DEFAULTSORT keys to make articles sort incorrectly in their categories, especially when you do so by hiding this away with a nasty template which hides the DEFAULTSORT from view, so your change is hidden away and less likely to be noticed by other editors, as you did here in the Bernd Gröne article.

Furthermore, that BD template accomplished nothing which was not already there before you added it, since Category:1963 births and Category:Living people were already there as was the DEFAULTSORT now hidden away by the template. There was no good reason to be using it in the first place.

Could you please fix this problem if you have done the same thing to other articles? Gene Nygaard (talk) 14:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I see no reason why you choose to ascribe ulterior motives to my use of a template. Further I would pointout that you now sort the page incorrectly.  I have corrected it. --  Barliner  talk  14:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, while a case can be made for your sorting in the English language, it is my sorting that is correct according to Categorization and Categorization of people, at least when they discussed this as they still should, though I don't find it now. Since no contrary indication is their now, there is no reason to assume a change in the prior guidelines. It doesn't really matter for our purposes, but my sorting would also be correct in German but yours is not. Gene Nygaard (talk) 14:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

League of Copyeditors roll call
Melon ‑ Bot  ( STOP! )  18:23, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter January 2008
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter January 2008

--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 05:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

William Mills (inventor)
Hi, I have added a fair bit to this page in rceent days, which is currently rated Stub class. I would love to see it upgraded a little, and wondered if you were the right person to ask to take a look? Seahamlass 15:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:BIRTH-DEATH-SORT
Template:BIRTH-DEATH-SORT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Magioladitis (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

✅

Fair use rationale for Image:Karl-Carstens.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Karl-Carstens.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

✅--  Barliner  talk 12:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB on articles about Swiss municipalities
The infoboxes all have a standarized format, thus please avoid using AWB on these articles to change blank space. In addition, your spelling changes break links. You may be blocked if you continue to do so. Besides, "Zurich" is not a misspelling, but a variant. -- User:Docu
 * Block me!!!!! Whatever happened to the concept of assume good faith? It was obvious I knew this should not have run on enwp by the fact that I reverted the changes.  True I should have checked that the servers had accepted all the reversions but I did not, for that I apologise.--  Barliner  talk  12:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User ex-Berlin
A tag has been placed on Template:User ex-Berlin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008 edition of the WikiProject Germany newsletter
This newsletter is delivered by a bot to all members of WikiProject Germany. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please leave a note at the talk page of the Outreach department so we can come up with a better spamlist solution. Thank you, - -  Newsletter Bot ' Talk  14:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)''

The "Prince/ss X of Wales" Issue
Just thought I'd let you know that there's a discussion about the above at the WikiProject, and I'm inviting all of the members to join in DBD 13:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2008
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2008


 * --Chef Tanner (talk) 17:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Template BD
Hi, you did the template BD. Could you help to adapt it for sw:wikipedia? We are very few people over there and none of us is good at a bit more complicated templates. The problem is syntax. In English it is Year-births/deaths. In Swahili it is the other way round: "Category:Waliozaliwa 1822". Waliozaliwa is births, Waliofariki is deaths. I tried but just managed to turn the "Waliozaliwa" around - it does, however, not show in the Category. For Deaths I am in the dark. I appreciate if you find a minute for us. No hurry. http://sw.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:BD --Kipala (talk) 10:27, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Karl-Carstens.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Karl-Carstens.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? – Quadell (talk) (random) 17:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2008
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2008


 * --Chef Tanner (talk) 15:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I notice that you tagged the page The Pavilion (office building) for speedy deletion with the reason "recently created redirect page resulting from a typo or misnomer which is implausible and not common, and is not in another language". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because this redirect was not created recently. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, or using the WP:RFD process. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 13:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Time for resolution
Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! DBD 15:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Category:Heinrich Hoffman in NARA public domain images
A tag has been placed on Category:Heinrich Hoffman in NARA public domain images, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

His name is Heinrich Hoffmann

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 78.53.51.85 (talk) 18:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Notification of the upcoming Wikimedia relicensing
In case you are not aware, the Free Software Foundation has added terms to the GFDL 1.3 allowing the relicensing of certain content under the CC-BY-SA 3.0, and the community has approved with 75.8% in favor that this permission be used to dual-license all Wikimedia wikis under both licenses. On June 15, 2009, this change will take effect. This note is to let you know that WikimediaNoLicensing does not affect the relicensing of your contributions in this manner, as you cannot deny the terms of the GFDL. If you have any comments, please join the discusion at Village pump (policy). Anomie⚔ 16:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nude celebrities on the Internet
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nude celebrities on the Internet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – iride  scent  16:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Barliner! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Klaus Schütz -
 * 2) Dietrich Stobbe -

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)