User:Barred.owl.24/Gene bank/Goober 6223 Peer Review

General info
Barred.owl.24
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Barred.owl.24/Gene bank
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gene bank

Lead
There doesn't seem to be a lead into this article.

Content
All the content added goes well with the article topic, I might reword some of the sentences to make them easier to read. But overall good added information.

Tone and Balance
All added content is very neutral and unbiased.

Sources and References
Not all your resources are peer reviewed articles, I would try to find more peer reviewed literature for your resources. All your sources are current and have good info for your article in them which you have conveyed very well. Your links seem functional thought-out the article. Over all great job!

Organization
All content is well written and easy to follow, I like the links you added to different word for clarification. I did not see any grammer or spelling errors. I like all your sections but I might shorten their names if possible. Good Job!

Images and Media
I like the picture you added but I would probably add some more since the original article had a few more than yours does now. Your article leads itself to have some pretty cool pictures.

Formatting
Something is a little weird with your formatting, from my end it seems like your wrote everything as subsections, not just the heading to each section.

Overall
Overall I think your article is very good, I would just add more information, more pictures, and find more peer-reviewed sources. Great Job!