User:BarrrrbY/The Great Buddha+/MomokoT Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing BarrrrbY's work.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link: User:BarrrrbY/The Great Buddha+


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link: The Great Buddha+

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead
 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - Yes, I noticed that you moved the premise part in the original article to the lead part, which I think is a reasonable change. The audience could acknowledge the summary of the movie.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes, the lead part includes important information about the movie, such as the producer, release date, languages, and so on.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, you added the plot section and the music section, which are closely related to the topic. The plot is detailed and provides an intriguing story background. The music section mentions the composer of the movie’s soundtrack, the movie’s album, and the creation background.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - To further expand this article, I would suggest adding some character introductions for the main characters. Also, there could be a production section talking about the film’s development, filming, visual effects, etc.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? - For the most part yes, the added content is mainly about the facts on the movie’s plot and music.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - The content is mainly about the achievements and praises won by this movie, I feel like it could be better to include some other perspectives from critical movie analysis.

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Most of the references come from reliable sources, including both English resources and Chinese resources.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? - For the plot section, the only reference is a Youtube trailer video, which I think might not cover the information written for the plot. I would suggest adding other sources related to the movie’s plot. Similarly, the content in the music part mainly comes from one single source, maybe adding resources written by a diverse spectrum of authors would be better.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - the content added is well-written and it is easy to read; The content added is well-organized, and it's broken down into sections/general headings and then with specific details.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - “This album have won the Best Original Film Score” should change have to has.

Overall impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete - Yes, By adding more information and reorganizing the existing content, I believe this article has been improved a lot.