User:Barry1819/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Shell plc

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because I know that the gas industry has a pretty big impact on global climate change. Shell is one of the largest companies in the world across all industries, so I am intrigued to see the type of impact it has.

Evaluate the article
-I think the lead section is concise, not overly detailed. It describes the article's main topics, and hints at the main sections of the article.

-The article's content is relevant and up to date. All of the content belongs. The article does not deal with equity gaps, and does not mention underrepresented populations or topics

-The article is neutral and impartial, it does not appear to be biased at all. I don't see any problems with the viewpoints, and I don't see any parts of the article that are trying to sway the reader in a certain direction

-The facts in this article are backed up by reliable secondary sources. These sources are thorough and current, many coming from the Shell website itself. They are also from a diverse group of authors. However, there are a few links that do not work.

-The article is well written and organized well. It is easy to read, and does not have grammatical or spelling errors. I think the sections are broken down well, they are all useful and don't go on for too long

-The article does contain images that enhance the understanding of the topic. They adhere to copyright regulations and are well captioned. They are placed well and are visually appealing

-In the talk page, this article is rated in the B-class. It is also a part of multiple WikiProjects. There are conversations about the history of Shell and the criticism it receives in the talk page

-I think this is a well developed article. The main weakness I found was that the article could've went more into detail about Shell's business groupings. That is the only section that I feel could be more well rounded, the rest of the sections are informative and useful to the reader. The main strength I see from this article is how in depth it goes with the company's history and how it started.