User:Barsoumd/Scolopendra Polymorpha/Tkshimiz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Barsoumd - David Barsoum


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Barsoumd/Scolopendra_Polymorpha?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Does not exist

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Your sandbox draft looks just like a full wikipedia article. I couldn't even tell if I was looking at an article that was already established with all the information or if I was looking at a draft until I found out there are no current versions of the article that your were assigned. The intro of your article also seems concise and to the point highlighting all the important key information about your species and topics discussed in the article.

Content


 * The content you listen seems to be relevant to your species and doesn't go off topic too much talking about other species or organisms. The section about the venom was actually really interesting to read and I'm sure others reading your article would benefit as well.

Tone and Balance


 * As far as the tone and balance of your writing, it seems pretty neutral and within the wikipedia standards they requested. It didn't seem like there was bias toward a certain topic as everything remained impartial. Balance seemed fine and information was evenly distributed throughout the topics and headings as well. No one topic has more information than the other.

Sources and Reference


 * After looking into your sources, they all seem to be relatively recent so the information you reported are all up to date and relevant. It seemed like you even correctly cited the photographs correctly. A diverse spectrum of authors seem to be cited and appropriately placed.

Organization


 * The formatting and organization seems to be very nicely done. Although I would remove the "lead" and "article body" heading prior to transferring the article to Wikipedia. I'm not sure if it's just on my end but theres a box with an exclamation mark with the directions. This could also be removed as well. There were no spelling and grammar issues detected as well.

Images and Media


 * I really like how you incorporated the speciesbox on the right with a picture of your species as it makes the formatting of the article very organized and professional. It also helps to see the scientific classification of your species as well. I really like the use of images throughout the paper at different locations and angles especially for a species that is new to me.

Overall Impression


 * Overall, I think you're off to a great start, in fact it looks almost completely ready to be moved to the Wikipedia article. It was a very informative yet interesting article to read and it would definitely help others understand and learn more about your species.