User:Bartleac2020/sandbox

The article I chose was about Occupational Science.

In the article there was nothing that appeared irrelevant to the topic. None of the information appeared to be out of date. There were some sources that were older but there were enough new sources used to make the article current. There wasn't a lot of information in the history of occupational science so there could be some added to that.

There were no biases noticed in this article that showed any opinion based information. View points expressed seemed to be well rounded, no noticeable side is favored.

The cites checked had functional links that contained relevant information. The sources used do not appear to have bias that were used. The references checked appeared to be reliable and from reviewed sources. Information came from academic journals and other sources that were reliable.

On the talk page there were references recommended for them to also use. The article was rated Start class. The article talked about peoples motivation for certain occupations like we did in class but talked more about the occupations than the poverty element.