User:BasilNotCilantro/Nonlinear expectation/Yibeiiiii Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

BasilNotCilantro


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:BasilNotCilantro/Nonlinear expectation


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nonlinear expectation

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) Lead Section (5/15)
 * 2) Introductory Sentence: excellent
 * 3) Summary: a little too mathematical
 * 4) Context: fair
 * 5) Article (10/25)
 * 6) Organization: fair
 * 7) Content: only skeleton
 * 8) Balance: cannot really tell because the current article does have too much content
 * 9) Tone: excellent
 * 10) Images: no images
 * 11) References (5/15)
 * 12) Citations: not enough citations
 * 13) Sources: relying on single source
 * 14) Completeness: fair
 * 15) Existing article (/20)
 * 16) New sections: /
 * 17) Re-organization: /
 * 18) Gaps: /
 * 19) Smaller additions: /
 * 20) New article (/10)
 * 21) Coverage: /
 * 22) Article body: /

Total (20/75) (The user did not make any changes yet, so the last two sections are not evaluated)