User:Basilgreenmint1/Subsistence agriculture/CBM33 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Basilgreenmint1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Basilgreenmint1/Subsistence_agriculture?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Subsistence agriculture

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead - The introductory sentence describes the article's topic well. Maybe include a description of the article's major sections? The lead does not include information that is not present in the article and is both concise and to the point.

History - I agree that it is a good idea to include information on why and how subsistence farming started. Maybe link the urbanization page when you discuss it in the last sentence of the paragraph?

Contemporary practices - The inclusion of a variety of countries' statistics is great.

Climate change impacts - You misspelled brought in the second sentence. Instead of poorer crop yields, maybe put "lower." Other than those small edits, I think that having a climate change impacts section is a good idea.

General - The tone of the article remains neutral throughout its entirety. There are not viewpoints that are left underrepresented or overrepresented. No claims that are made come across as biased. The content of the article is up to date, with recent sources. The content of the article is well-written and accurately reflects the content of the sources. The sources all seem to be topical and reliable. The organization of the article is well thought out and logical.

Response:

Hi! Good idea to add a description sentence in the intro section. Good catch, we will fix that spelling error and I agree with you that poorer crop yields doesn't sound very good! Thanks for your feedback!