User:Basilgreenmint1/Subsistence agriculture/Kt1628 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I definitely think the information presented is relevant to the existing article and the presentation of it remains subjective. The only thing is it could use more citations. I noticed a references at the bottom, but the draft had very few citations throughout it. I think there should be at least one citation at the end of each paragraph, even if the next paragraph uses the same source. Additionally, there was a lot of repetitive wording of substistence agriculture, which while that's what is being talked about, there could be ways to alter wording to refer to it more indirectly and avoid that repitition.

Response:

Hi! Thank you for your comments. As we keep editing we will try to add more citation, I didn't even really realize we didn't have that many so thanks for pointing that out!